Comparative morphology of the lower gastrointestinal tract of experimental animals and humans

In this review, a have been continued comparative study of gastrointestinal tract of the human and laboratory animals the most widely used in pre-clinical studies (rats, mice, hamsters, rabbits, guinea pigs). Generalized data on the comparative morphology of the organs of the lower part of the digestive system - the small and large intestine -are presented. The both anatomical and histological structure of the intestine has a common morphological principle characteristic of mammals. However, there are a number of features that have arisen as a result of different types of food species. Especially it affected the cecum, which in humans is the shortest, and in animals it lengthens, bends and reaches considerable dimensions in guinea pigs. The large saccule caecum is characteristic of herbivores as it is a reservoir of enzymatic and microbiological treatment of chime. The duodenum in humans and rodents is similar in its anatomical structure and topography and it is possible to determine only some differences in the topography of the excretory sections of the bile and pancreatic ducts. The intestine in rabbits is considerably longer than in the other examined species with the bile and pancreatic ducts separated by a considerable distance. The small intestine of rabbits has a number of anatomical landmarks, due to which it can be clearly divided into iliac and skinny which is not observed in other species. In humans, mice and guinea pigs one mesentery fixes the intestine while two in rabbits, rats and hamsters are isolated. The mucous membrane of the human intestine has circular folds that are absent in animals. The long, smooth, devoid of pronounced semilunar folds colon in animals continues with the prerectum, while in the human separates a sigmoid colon with its mesentery. The rectum has an ampoule only in humans, rats and rabbits. The cellular structure of the wall of the small and large intestine is fun damentally monotonous and has insignificant structural features. The circulatory, lymphatic and nervous systems of the digestive system are also extremely similar between animals and humans.

лабораторные животные, сравнительная морфология, желудочно-кишечный тракт, тонкая кишка, толстая кишка, laboratory animals, comparative morphology, gastrointestinal tract, small intestine, large intestine

1. Гущин, Я.А. Сравнительная анатомия верхнего отдела желудочно-кишечного тракта экспериментальных животных и человека/Я.А. Гущин, А.А. Мужикян, B.В. Шедько, М.Н. Макарова, В.Г Макаров// Международный вестник ветеринарии. - 2017. - № 31. -С. 116-129

2. Жеденов, В. Н. Анатомия кролика // -М.: Сов. Наука. -1957. -312с.

3. Ким, А.Д. Особенности топографической анатомии и пристеночной микрофлоры дистального отдела толстой кишки у крыс линии Wistar /А.Д. Ким, О.А. Гольдберг, С.А. Лепехова// Бюллетень. ВСНЦ СО РАМН. -2016. -Т.1, №2. -С. 48-54

4. Макарова, М.Н. Анатомофизиологическая характеристика пищеварительного тракта у человека и лабораторных животных/ М.Н. Макарова, А.В. Рыбакова, Я.А. Гущин, В.В. Шедько, А.А. Мужикян, В.Г. Макаров // Международный вестник ветеринарии. -2016. -№1. - C. 82-104

5. Ноздрачев, А. Д. Анатомия крысы // Лань. -2001. -464 с.

6. Петренко, В.М. Форма и топография слепой кишки у белой крысы // Успехи современного естествознания. -2011. -№12. - С. 17-21.

7. Петренко, В.М. Форма и топография слепой кишки у морской свинки // Успехи современного естествознания. -2013. -№2. -С. 27-35.

8. Сапин, М.Р. Анатомия человека в двух томах // Медицина.-2001. -Т.2. -640с.

9. Татаренко, Д.П. Пищеварительная система белых крыс: анатомофункциональные особенности и экспериментальные работы: монография // РУ-САЙНС. -2016. -92с.

10. Хэм, А. Гистология // - М.: Мир. -1983. -Т-4. -245с.

11. Щипакин, М.В. Анатомотопографические особенности строения толстой кишки кролика породы немецкий великан / М.В. Щипакин, А.В. Прусаков, Н.В. Зеленевский, С.В. Вирунен, Ю.Ю. Бартенова // Иппология и ветеринария. - 2017. -№4. -С. 92-95.

12. Cheryl, L. A Practical Guide to the Histology of the Mouse //Wiley. -2014. -248pp.

13. Dimitrov, R.S. Comparative ultrasonographic, anatomotopographic and macromorphometric study of the spleen and pancreas in rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) // Not Sci Biol. -2012. -Vol.4. -P. 14-20.

14. Eurell, J.A. Dellmann's Textbook of Veterinary Histology. Sixth edition // Blackwell. -2006. -416pp.

15. Huffman, K. Gross and histological studies of the digestive tract of the rabbit // Kansas State College of Agriculture and Applied Science. -1958. -58pp.

16. Kararli, T.T. Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals // Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition. -1995. -Vol.16. -№5. -P. 351-380.

17. Leeson, C.R. The fine structure of Brunner's glands in the rabbit // Anatomical Record. -1967.Vol.159. -p. 409-420.

18. Reznik, G. Clinical Anatomy of the European Hamster: Cricetus cricetus // L.U.S. -1978. -251pp.

19. Snipes, R.L. Anatomy of the cecum of the laboratory mouse and rat // Anat Embryol. -1981. -Vol. -№162. -P.455-74.

20. Snipes, R.L. Anatomy of the Guinea-pig Cecum // Anat Embryol. -1982. -Vol.165. -P.97-111.

21. Snipes, R.L. Anatomy of the rabbit cecum // Anat Embryol. -1978. -Vol.155. -P.57-80.

22. Suckow, M.A. The laboratory rabbit, guinea pig, hamster, and other rodents // Am. Col.of Lab. An. Med.series. -2012. -1261pp.

23. Tajima, Y. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic carcinogenesis in the hamster // Springer. -2009. -241pp.

24. Treuting, P.M. Comparative Anatomy and Histology: A Mouse and Human Atlas // Elsevier. -2012. -461pp.

25. Vashisht, K. Pancreatic Ducts and Duodenal Papillae: Pathologic Evaluation in Nonclinical Species-A Brief Review // Tox.Pat. - 2015. -Vol. -28. -P. 651-61.