Effectiveness of introductory crossing of Kostroma cattle with brown swiss bulls
https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2072-2419.2026.2.305
Abstract
The article presents the results of a comprehensive study on the impact of the degree of «Swissbreeding» (upgrading) on the realization of the life potential of Kostroma cows at the breeding plant. A retrospective analysis of lifetime performance indicators of 432 cows from the «Karavaevo» breeding plant (Kostroma region) was conducted. Animals were stratified into four groups based on the percentage of Brown Swiss blood: low (≤50 %), medium (51—75 %), high (76—88 %), and very high (>88 %). Statistical data processing was performed in the R environment using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test, and linear regression modeling. A statistically significant negative correlation was established between the share of improving breed blood and life span (rs=-0,25; p<0,001), as well as total lifetime milk yield (rs=-0,15; p<0,01). It was revealed that animals with low blood percentage (≤50 %) possess the best economic and biological characteristics, with a median lifetime yield of 32232 kg, which is significantly higher than in other groups. High-grade crosses implement a «sprinter» productivity model, demonstrating a high Milk per Day of Life index (MDL≈13,66 kg), but are characterized by early culling. The constructed regression model proved that 80 % of the variation in lifetime productivity is driven by the time factor, with each additional day of life increasing the total yield by 16,6 kg. A decrease in butterfat content from 4,17 % in low-blood cows to 4,05 % in high-blood animals was also noted. The strategy of upgrading crossing (top-crossing) under the conditions of this herd is recognized as inefficient. To maximize gross milk production and preserve the adaptive qualities of the Kostroma breed, it is recommended to maintain the share of Brown Swiss blood at a level of no more than 50—75 %.
About the Authors
A. I. AbilovRussian Federation
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Honored Scientist, Chief Researcher, Department of Population
Genetics and Genetic Foundations of Animal Breeding
Yu. A. Korneenko-Zhilyaev
Russian Federation
PhD in Biological Sciences, Director of
K. N. Narozhnykh
Russian Federation
PhD in Biological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Applied Bioinformatics
References
1. Khamzina A.K., Yurchenko A.A., Yudin N.S., Ibragimov P.Sh., Usenbekov E.S., Larkin D.M. History, current state and genetic characteristics of local cattle breeds of the Republic of Kazakhstan // Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2024. Vol. 28, No. 4. P. 416—423.
2. Chimidova N. V., Ubushieva A. V. et al. Use of biotechnological methods for accelerated improvement of Kalmyk cattle // Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture. 2025. Vol. 17, No. 6—2. pp. 475—493.
3. Rusanova S. A., Koltsov D. N. Monitoring of alleles of genetic markers in the process of selection of Brown Swiss cattle // Technical crops. Scientific agricultural journal. 2023. Vol. 3, No. 4 (10). P. 71—77.
4. Chavtaraev R. M. Results of crossing Caucasian Brown cows with a Swiss bull in the mountainous province of Dagestan // Mountain agriculture. 2022. No. 1. P. 58—61.
5. Pozdnyakova V. F., Avdeev D. S., Pozdnyakov I. A. Efficiency of crossing Kostroma cows with Aberdeen Angus and Limousin bulls // Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2014. No. 5—6 (5). P. 17—19.
6. Baranova N. S., Furaeva N. S., Zvereva E. A., Korolev A. A., Vorobyeva S. S. Determination of optimal parameters of Brown Swiss bloodline in improving Kostroma cattle // Dairy and beef cattle breeding. 2024. No. 4. pp. 13—18.
7. Sarmiento-García A., Vieira-Aller C. Improving fatty acid profile in native breed pigs using dietary strategies: A review // Animals. 2023. Vol. 13, no. 10. p. 1696.
8. Skvortsova E. G. Effect of the proportion of Holstein bloodline on the productive longevity of Black-and-White cattle // Bulletin of Biotechnology. 2020. No. 1 (22). P. 15.
9. Ribeiro A. M. F., Sanglard L. P. et al. Genetic parameters, heterosis, and breed effects for body condition score and mature cow weight in beef cattle // Journal of Animal Science. 2022. Vol. 100, no. 2. P. skac017.
10. Korolev A. A., Baranova N. S. Analysis of the fulfillment of target indicators of the selection and breeding plan for the Kostroma cattle breed in the Kostroma region // Agrarian Bulletin of the Non-Black Earth Region. 2024. No. 2 (14). P. 51—58.
11. Sirotina M. V., Muradova L. V. Structure of the nasolabial mirror and productivity of Kostroma cattle // Bulletin of the Kostroma State University named after N. A. Nekrasov. 2007. Vol. 13, No. 1. P. 19—22.
12. Baranova N. S., Korolev A. A., Kazakov D. S. Milk productivity and the period of productive use of Kostroma cows at the Karavaevo breeding farm in the Kostroma region // Bulletin of the APK of the Upper Volga region. 2024. No. 1 (65). P. 96—102.
Review
For citations:
Abilov A.I., Korneenko-Zhilyaev Yu.A., Narozhnykh K.N. Effectiveness of introductory crossing of Kostroma cattle with brown swiss bulls. International Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2026;(2):305-311. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2072-2419.2026.2.305
JATS XML

















