IN VITRO evaluation of probiotic properties and bacteriocinogenic potential of strains of microorganisms L. Acidophilus 13, E. Faecium K-50 and their compositions
https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2072-2419.2023.4.78
Abstract
It is known that the gut microbiota plays a central role in the health and biology of the animal, and is therefore important for scientific research. Microorganisms of the genus Lactobacllus are widespread in nature and are considered representatives of the microflora of the macroorganism of the animal. Lactobacllus acidophilus is widely used as a probiotic, and is known for its immunostimulating effect, it colonizes the intestines of a newborn and accompanies the animal throughout its life. Enterococcus faecium is also used as a probiotic, due to its high antagonistic activity against pathogenic microbiota, and also participates in the formation and maintenance of immunity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the probiotic component of L. acidophilus 13, E. faecium k-50 in conditions simulating the gastrointestinal tract, to study the bacteriocinogenic potential and antagonistic properties of lactobacilli and enterococci and their composition. In this review, we summarize recent advances in understanding the mechanisms involved in bacterial tolerance to bile, with particular emphasis on research contributions. In addition, the physiological and ecological role of enzymes and their importance for animal health, as well as the function of bile acid as a regulator of metabolism, are discussed. Samples were used in the study.
About the Authors
A. I. Zhivoderova
Stavropol State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Asp. base of the Department of Epizootology and Microbiology
V. S. Samoylenko
North Caucasus Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Acting Department of Zoology and Parasitology of the Faculty of Medicine and Biology
References
1. Andreeva A.V., Nikolaeva O. N., Kadyrova D. V., Altynbekov O. M. Probiotics for correction of enterobiocenosis of calves / A.V. Andreeva, O. N. Nikolaeva, D. V. Kadyrova, O. M. Altynbekov // BONTS UrO RAS. – 2014. – No.3. – P. 4.
2. Borovkova E.A. The study of biological properties and probiotic potential of intestinal lactobacilli / E.A. Borovkova, E.V. Aliyeva, T.V. Frolova // Acta Biomedica Scientifica. – 2019. – No. 1. – P. 124-132.
3. Duskaev G.K. The use of probiotics and plant extracts to improve the productivity of ruminants (review) / G.K. Duskaev, G.I. Levakhin, V.L. Korolev, F.H. Sirazetdinov // Animal husbandry and feed production. – 2019. – No. 1. – P. 136-148.
4. Kitaevskaya S. V. Modern trends in selection and identification of probiotic strains of lactic acid bacteria // Bulletin of Kazan Technological University. - 2012. – No. 17. – P.184-188.
5. Mannapova R. T. Milk serum and probiotic for correction of biological and increase of productive indicators of animals / R. T. Mannapova, I. M. Fayzullin // Scientific notes of the Bauman KGAVM. – 2010. – P.127-130.
6. Poymanov M.A. Hematological, biochemical and immunological status of calves obtained with different reproduction technologies: dis. candidate of Veterinary Sciences.: 06.02.01 / Poymanov Maxim Alexandrovich. Saratov, 2022. – P. 198.
7. Setdekov R. A. Immunological parameters of newborn calves in farms unfavorable for factor infections / R. A. Setdekov, R. H. Yusupov, G.R. Yusupova // Scientific notes of the Bauman KGAVM. - 2013. – No.1. – P. 251-256.
8. Khamagaeva I.S., Shchekotova A.V., Khamaganova I.V. Fermented milk product enriched with iron / I.S. Khamagaeva, A.V. Shchekotova, I.V. Khamaganova // Far Eastern Agrarian Bulletin. – 2017. – №2 (42). – P. 132-138.
9. Anadón, A. Regulation and guidelines of probiotics and prebiotics. In: Ötles S, editor. Probiotics and prebiotics in food, nutrition and health / A. Anadón, V. Castellano, M.R. Martínez-Larrañaga // Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Press, LLC. Taylor & Francis Group. – 2014. – P. 91-113.
10. Bajagai, Y.S. Probiotics in animal nutrition—production, impact and regulation. / Y.S. Bajagai, A.V. Klieve, P.J. Dart, W.L. Bryden // In: Makkar HPS, editor. FAO animal production and health paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. – 2016. – Vol. 179. – P. 313-321.
11. Bengmark, S. Bioecological control of the gastrointestinal tract: the role of flora and supplemented probiotics and synbiotics / S. Bengmark // Gastroenterol Clin North Am. – 2005. – Vol. 34. – P. 413-436.
12. Bernardeau M., Lehtinen M.J., Forssten S.D., Nurminen P. Importance of the gastro-intestinal life cycle of Bacillus for probiotic functionality / M. Bernardeau, M.J. Lehtinen, S.D. Forssten, P. Nurminen // J. Food Sci. Technol. – 2017. – Vol. 54. – P. 2570-2584.
13. Borchers, A.T. Probiotics and immunity / A.T. Borchers, C. Selmi, F.J. Meyers, C.L. Keen, M.E. Gershwin // J Gastroenterol. – 2009. – Vol. 44. – P. 26-46.
14. Bustos A.Y., Font de Valdez G., Fadda S., Taranto M.P. New insights into bacterial bile resistance mechanisms: the role of bile salt hydrolase and its impact on human health / A.Y. Bustos, G. Font de Valdez, S. Fadda, M.P. Taranto // Food Res Int [Internet]. – 2018. – V. 112. – P. 250-262.
15. Cavaco L.M. Detection of linezolid resistance due to the optrA gene in Enterococcus faecalis from poultry meat from the / L.M. Cavaco, J.F. Bernal, E. Zankari, M. Leon, R.S. Hendriksen, E. Perez-Gutierrez et al. // American continent (Colombia). J Anti-microb Chemother. – 2017. – V. 72(3). – P. 678-683.
16. Cencic, A. The role of functional foods, nutraceuticals, and food supplements in intestinal health / A. Cencic, W. Chingwaru // Nutrients. – 2010. – Vol. 2(6). –P. 611-625.
17. Charteris, W.P. Gradient diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing of potentially probiotic lactobacilli / W.P. Charteris, [et all] // J. Food Prot. - 2001. - V. 64. - P. 2007-2014.
18. 18. Gibson, R.G. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics / R.G. Gibson, M.B. Roberfroid // J Appl Bacteriol. – 1995. – Vol. 125(6). – P. 1401-1412.
19. Grajek, W. Probiotics, prebiotics and antioxidants as functional foods / W. Grajek, A. Olejnik, A. Sip // Acta Biochim Pol. – 2005. – Vol. 52(3). – P. 665-671.
20. Krysiak K. Overview of the use of probiotics in poultry production / K. Krysiak, D. Konkol, M. Korczyński // Animals. – 2021. – Vol. 11. – P. 1620.
21. Kuhn, K.A. Peripheral education of the immune system by the colonic microbiota / K.A. Kuhn, T.S. Stappenbeck // Semin Immunol. – 2013. – Vol. 25. – P. 364-369.
22. Munita J.M., Bayer A.S., Arias C.A. Evolving resistance among Gram-positive pathogens. Clin Infect Dis. – 2015. – V. 61. Suppl 2. – pp. 48-57.
23. Munita J.M., Tran T.T., Diaz L. et al. A liaF codon deletion abolishes daptomycin bactericidal activity against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis // Antimicrob Agents Chemother. – 2013.
24. Rawi, M.H. Prebiotics metabolism by gut-isolated probiotics. / M.H. Rawi, S.A. Zaman, K.F. Pa’ee, S.S. Leong, S.R. Sarbini // J. Food Sci. Technol. – 2020. – P. 13197.
25. Sarti M., Campanile F., Sabia C., Santagati M., Gargiulo R., Stefani S. Polyclonal diffusion of beta-lactamase-producing Enter-ococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50 (1): 169-172.
26. Scavuzzi, B.M. Impact of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics on components of the metabolic syndrome / B.M. Scavuzzi, F.C. Henrique, LHS. Miglioranza, et al. // Ann Nutr Disord Ther. – 2014. – Vol. 1. – P. 1009.
Review
For citations:
Zhivoderova A.I., Samoylenko V.S. IN VITRO evaluation of probiotic properties and bacteriocinogenic potential of strains of microorganisms L. Acidophilus 13, E. Faecium K-50 and their compositions. International Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2023;(4):78-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2072-2419.2023.4.78
Views:
188
Email this article 