Preview

International Journal of Veterinary Medicine

Advanced search

The microbial landscape of the genital tract of healthy cows with different gestation periods

https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2072-2419.2023.4.431

Abstract

The doctrine of the normal microflora of the human and animal body is currently in the focus of attention of clinical microbiologists and a wide range of clinical specialists. It is known that the microflora of the vagina depends on many factors of the internal and external  environment,  therefore,  it  is  now considered to be an ecosystem with a unique set of mechanisms that ensure its resistance to  foreign  microorganisms  and  support  reproductive health. The aim of the study was to study changes in vaginal microbiocenosis in cows during different periods of pregnancy.  The  object  of  the  study  was  clinically healthy cows (n=10) of a redmottled breed (holshitinized), and the subject of the study was  cervical–vaginal  mucus.  On  the  150-160, 210-220 and 260-265 days of pregnancy,  mucus  samples  were  taken  from  cows using sterile probe tampons for bacteriological studies. It was found that representatives of  the  normoflora,  as  well  as  conditionally pathogenic and pathogenic microflora were present in the vaginal secretions of animals of  all  periods  of  pregnancy.  However,  the total  bacterial  contamination  of  the  genital tract in cows in the first half and second half of the third trimester of pregnancy was characterized by its decrease by 29.2 and 33.3%, respectively, relative to the data obtained in the second trimester. It should also be noted that by the second half of the third trimester of pregnancy, there is an increase in obligate normoflora due to lacto- and bifidobacteria by 27.1% and 4 times, respectively, with the predominance of the genus Lactobacillus in quantitative terms. Against this background, the amount of transient microflora decreased by 34.2-57.1% (P0.05).

About the Authors

P. A. Parshin
All-Russian Scientific Research Veterinary Institute of Pathology, Pharmacology and Therapy
Russian Federation

Doctor of Veterinary Sciences,  Professor,  Director



G. A. Vostroilova
All-Russian Scientific Research Veterinary Institute of Pathology, Pharmacology and Therapy
Russian Federation

Doctor of Biological Sciences, Chief Scientific Officer. 
sotr.  Department  of  Experimental  Pharmacology and Functioning of Living Systems



Yu. N. Brigadirov
All-Russian Scientific Research Veterinary Institute of Pathology, Pharmacology and Therapy
Russian Federation

Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Chief Scientific Officer. sotr. Department of  Experimental  Pharmacology  and Functioning  of  Living  Systems 



I. T. Shaposhnikov
All-Russian Scientific Research Veterinary Institute of Pathology, Pharmacology and Therapy
Russian Federation

Doctor of Biological Sciences, ch. sci. sotr. Department  of Experimental  Pharmacology and Functioning of Living Systems



M. S. Zhukov
All-Russian Scientific Research Veterinary Institute of Pathology, Pharmacology and Therapy
Russian Federation

st. cand.  veterinarian.  sciences,  art.  sci.  sotr. Department of Experimental  Pharmacology and Functioning of Living Systems



O. A. Manzhurina
All-Russian Scientific Research Veterinary Institute of Pathology, Pharmacology and Therapy
Russian Federation

st  cand.  veterinarian.  sciences,  head.  Laboratory  of Microbiology  and Molecular Genetic Analysis



I. S. Perepelkina
All-Russian Scientific Research Veterinary Institute of Pathology, Pharmacology and Therapy
Russian Federation

ml.  scientific. sotr. Laboratories of Microbiology and Molecular Genetic Analysis



O. V. Yakimchuk
CJSC "Yudanovskie prostory"
Russian Federation

veterinarian



References

1. Laptev G.Yu., Novikova N.I., Ilyina L.A., Yyldyrym E.A., Dumova V.A., Korochkina E.A. Issledovanie vaginal'noj slizi vysokoproduktivnykh korov v posleotyol'nyj period posredstvom PTSR v real'nom vremeni [Research of vaginal bacterial slime matrix of high-yielding cows in postpartum period by realtime pcr-method]. Russian Veterinary Journal. 2014; 3: 10-12.

2. Melkumyan A.R., Priputnevitch T.V., Ankirskaya A.S., Trofimov D.Yu., Muravyova V.V., Mullabaeva S.M., Zavyalova M.G. Vidovoj sostav laktobakterij pri razlichnom sostoyanii mikrobioty u beremennykh [Lactobacilli species diversity in different states of vaginal microbiota in pregnant women]. Clinical microbiology and antimicrobial chemical therapy. 2013; 15(1): 72-79.

3. Sashnina L.Yu., Shakhov A.G., Vladimirova Yu.Yu., Nikonenko G.V. Role cytokines in a physiological course of pregnancy[Rol' tsitokinov v obespechenii fiziologicheskogo techeniya beremennosti]. Veterinarnyj farmakologicheskij vestnik. 2022; №3 (20): 144-152. doi: 10.17238/issn2541-8203.2022.3.144.

4. Seythanova B.T., Shapambaev N.C., Olzhayeva R.R., Kalmenova P.E. Mikrobiotsenoz vlagalishha i kishechnika beremennykh zhenshhin [Microbiocenosis vagina and intestine of pregnant women]. Science and healthcare. 2014; 1: 70-71.

5. Skorikov V.N., Nezdanov A.G., Mikhalev V.I. Akusherskaya i ginekologicheskaya patologiya u korov pervotyolok semmental'skoj porody pri raznom vozraste vvoda ikh v proizvodstvo [Obstetric end gynecologic pathology in fresh cows of simmental breed under various ages of beginning reproduction]. Veterinary medicine. 2017; 1: 38-41

6. Bergey D.H., Krieg N.R., Holt J.G. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Baltimore, MD : Williams & Wilkins, 1989; 2648 рр.

7. Boris S., Barbés C. Role played by lactobacilli in controlling the population of vaginal pathogens. Microb Infect. 2000; 2: 543– 546. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)00313-0.

8. Deng F., McClure M., Rorie R., Wang X., Chai J., Wei X., Lai S., Zhao J. The vaginal and fecal microbiomes are related to pregnancy status in beef heifers. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019;10: 92. doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0401-2.

9. Kalinka J., Krajewski P., Sobala W., Wasiela M., Brzezińska-Błaszczyk E. The association between maternal cervicovaginal proinflammatory cytokines concentrations during pregnancy and subsequent earlyonset neonatal infection. J Perinat Med. 2006; 34 (5): 371-377. DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2006.075.

10. Laguardia-Nascimento M., Branco K.M., Gasparini M.R., Giannattasio-Ferraz S., Leite L.R., Araujo F.M., Salim A.C., Nicoli J.R., de Oliveira GC, Barbosa-Stancioli E.F. Vaginal Microbiome Characterization of Nellore Cattle Using Metagenomic Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10 (11): e0143294. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143294.

11. Quinn P.J., Markey B.K., Leonard F.C., FitzPatrick E.S., Fanning S [et al.] Veterinary Microbiology and Microbial Disease. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011; 912 рр.

12. Verstraelen H., Verhelst R., Claeys G., De Backer E., Temmerman M., Vaneechoutte M. Longitudinal analysis of the vaginal microflora in pregnancy suggests that L crispatus promotes the stability of the normal vaginal microflora and that L gasseri and/or L iners are more conducive to the occurrence of abnormal vaginal microflora. BMC Microbiol. 2009; 9:116. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-116.

13. Zhukov M.S., Alekhin Yu.N. Detection of the upper respiratory tract bacteria in newborn calves. Reproduction in domestic animals. 2022; 57 (S1): 97. DOI: 10.1111/rda.14052.


Review

For citations:


Parshin P.A., Vostroilova G.A., Brigadirov Yu.N., Shaposhnikov I.T., Zhukov M.S., Manzhurina O.A., Perepelkina I.S., Yakimchuk O.V. The microbial landscape of the genital tract of healthy cows with different gestation periods. International Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2023;(4):431-437. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2072-2419.2023.4.431

Views: 247


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-2419 (Print)