Preview

International Journal of Veterinary Medicine

Advanced search

Evaluation of the parameters of variability of the productivity of kholmogory breed bulls

https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2072-2419.2024.3.365

Abstract

For the first time in Russia a mathematical analysis of sperm production of Kholmogory stud bulls will be performed based on a linear equation model. The aim of the research was to evaluate the parameters of variability of the productivity of Kholmogory stud bulls based on a linear equation model. The object of the study was Kholmogory stud bulls (n = 72) born and used mainly in the Komi Republic. The main aspects of sperm productivity that were the subject of the study include the following parameters: "proportion of live sperm", "sperm concentration", "proportion of sperm with PPD, (%)", "number of sperm with PPD in a dose", "number of sperm with intact acrosome", "number of sperm with abnormal morphology", "sperm survival at 38°C, h". The collected data were analyzed using a mixed equation model approach with the REMLF90 restricted maximum likelihood program. The highest values of the genetic correlation coefficient were found for such sperm production parameters as "sperm concentration, million/ml" - it was reliably positively associated with "the number of sperm with PPD in a dose, million" and "the number of sperm with an intact acrosome, %". In this case, the correlations were at the level of r=0.6-0.8. "The number of sperm with abnormal morphology, %" positively correlated with "the proportion of live sperm, %" and with the "sperm survival at 38°C" parameter. Negatively strong reliable relationships were not established either for the values of genetic or paratypic correlations. Low heritability of sperm productivity parameters (0.039…0.112) indicates that the influence of genetics on these parameters is small. Among these parameters, the highest heritability coefficient was demonstrated by the parameter “sperm survival at 38°C” (0.322). In light of the analysis of sperm productivity as a complex of parameters, it can be stated that this system demonstrates significant stability and variability, which emphasizes the importance of taking into account various aspects when assessing sperm productivity.

About the Authors

I. S. Nedashkovsky
L. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation

Nedashkovsky I.S. – candidate of biological sciences, senior researcher, head of Department of the National Catalog, 



A. F. Conte
L. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation

Conte A.F. – candidate of agricultural sciences, senior researcher of population genetics and animal breeding department



D. M. Rudianov
L. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation

Rudianov D.M. – leading technologist of the cryobank development group



A. S. Abdelmanova
L. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation

Abdelmanova A.S. – doctor of biological sciences, senior researcher of laboratory of functional and evolutionary genomics of animals



N. A. Volkova
L. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation

Volkova N.A. – doctor of biological sciences, chief researcher, head of cell engineering laboratory



A. A. Sermyagin
All-Russian Research Institute of Genetics and Breeding of Farm Animals
Russian Federation

Sermyagin A.A. – candidate of agricultural sciences, director



I. V. Gusev
L. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation

Gusev I.V. – candidate of biological sciences, director of National center for genetic resources of agricultural animals



N. A. Zinovieva
L. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation

Zinovieva N.A. – doctor of biological sciences, professor, member of RAS, director 



References

1. Gillan L., Kroetsch T., Maxwell W.M. Ch., Evans G. Assessment of in vitro sperm characteristics in relation to fertility in dairy bulls // Animal Reproduction Science. — 2008. —Vol. 103. -Is. 3-4. — P. 201— 214

2. Singh R.K., Kumaresan A., Chhillar Sh., Rajak Sh.K., Tripathi U.K., Nayak S., Datta T.K., Mohanty T.K., Malhotra R. Identification of suitable combinations of in vitro sperm- function test for the prediction of fertility in buffalo bull // Theriogenology. — 2016 Dec; 86(9):2263–2271. e1.

3. Chenoweth P. J. Genetic sperm defects // Theriogenology. - 2005. - Vol. 64. — Is. 3. — P. 457— 468.

4. Druet T., Fritz S., Sellem S., Basso B., Ge O., Salas-Cortes L., Humblot P., Druart X., Eggen A. Estimation of genetic parameters and genome scan for 15 semen characteristics traits of Holstein bulls // J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 126. - 2009. - P. 269-277.

5. Pyzhova E., Ivanov Yu. , Eskin G. Influence of a complex of traits on the quality of semen of breeding bulls // Dairy and meat cattle breeding. 2011. No. 1. P. 22–23.

6. Naryshkina E.N., Sermyagin A.A., Yanchukov I.N., Strekozov N.I., Zinovieva N.A. Influence of genetic and paratypic factors on qualitative and quantitative indices of semen of breeding bulls // Dairy and meat cattle breeding. 2017. No. 4. P. 15-19.

7. Murphy E. M., Kelly A. K., O'Meara C., Eivers B., Lonergan P., Fair S. Influence of bull age, ejaculate number, and season of collection on semen production and sperm motility parameters in Holstein Friesian bulls in a commercial artificial insemination centre // Journal of Animal Science. 2018. Vol. 96. pp. 2408–2418. DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky130.

8. Estimation of genetic parameters and genome scan for 15 semen characteristics traits of Holstein bulls / T. Druet, S. Fritz, E. Sellem, et al. // J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2009. Vol. 126.No. 4. pp. 269–277

9. Berry D. P., Wall E., Pryce J. E. Genetics and genomics of reproductive performance in dairy and beef cattle // New Practices International Cow Fertility Conf. Ireland, Westport, 2014. Vol. 8. P. 105–121.

10. Suchocki T., Szyda J. Genome-wide association study for semen production traits in Holstein-Friesian bulls // Journal of Dairy Science. 2015. Vol. 98.No. 8. P. 5774–5780. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8951.

11. Overview of fertility traits in Russian Holstein bulls using genome-wide association / A. A. Sermyagin, E. N. Naryshkina, E. A. Gladyr, et al. // Reproduction Fertility and Development. 2017. Vol. 29.No. 1. R. 176. doi: 10.1071/RDv29n1Ab132.

12. Genetic effects of PDGFRB and MARCH1 identified in GWAS revealing strong associations with semen production traits in Chinese Holstein bulls / Sh. Liu, H. Yin, C. Li, et al. // BMC Genetics [Electronic resource]. 2017. Vol. 18. Article 63 URL: https://bmcgenet. biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12863-017-0527-1. (access date: 06/15/2020). doi:10.1186/s12863-017-0527-1.

13. Genetics of bull semen characteristics in a multi-breed cattle population / D. P. Berry, B. Eivers, G. Dunne, et al. // Theriogenology. 2019. Vol. 123. No. 1. P. 202–208. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.10.006.

14. Time trends, environmental factors and genetic basis of semen traits collected in Holstein bulls under commercial conditions/S. Karoui, C. Diaz, M. Serrano, et al. // J. Animal Reproduction Science. 2011. Vol. 124. Is. 1–2. P. 28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.02.008.

15. Ugnivenko A.N. On the problem of using meat forms in beef cattle breeding // Bulletin of the Bryansk State Agricultural Academy. - 2015. - No. 3-1. - P. 12-14.

16. Olsen H. B., Heringstad B., Klemetsdal G. Genetic analysis of semen characteristic traits in young Norwegian Red bulls // Journal of Dairy Science. 2020. Vol. 103. P. 545–555. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17291.

17. Genetic effects of PDGFRB and MARCH1 identified in GWAS revealing strong associations with semen production traits in Chinese Holstein bulls / Sh. Liu, H. Yin, C. Li, et al. // BMC Genetics [Electronic resource]. 2017. Vol. 18. Article 63 URL: https://bmcgenet. biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12863-017-0527-1. (access date: 06/15/2020). doi:10.1186/s12863-017-0527-1.

18. Genetics of bull semen characteristics in a multi-breed cattle population / D. P. Berry, B. Eivers, G. Dunne, et al. // Theriogenology. 2019. Vol. 123. No. 1. P. 202–208. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.10.006.

19. Suchocki T., Szyda J. Genome-wide association study for semen production traits in Holstein-Friesian bulls // Journal of Dairy Science. 2015. Vol. 98. No. 8. P. 5774–5780. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8951.

20. Naryshkina E.A., Ermilov A.N. Selection and genetic parameters of traits of own productivity of breeding bulls in different age periods // Agrarian scientific journal. 2022. No. 2. P. 44–49. doi: 10.28983/asj.y2022i2pp44-49

21. Misztal I., Tsruta S., Strabel T. et. al. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90) // Proceedings of the 7th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production. Montpellier, 2002. Vol. 28 (27). pp. 21–22.


Review

For citations:


Nedashkovsky I.S., Conte A.F., Rudianov D.M., Abdelmanova A.S., Volkova N.A., Sermyagin A.A., Gusev I.V., Zinovieva N.A. Evaluation of the parameters of variability of the productivity of kholmogory breed bulls. International Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2024;(3):365-376. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2072-2419.2024.3.365

Views: 68


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-2419 (Print)