Comparative analysis of phenotypic and genetic correlations between zootechnical traits in domestic reindeer

The study was conducted to determine the possibility of using phenotypic correlations between traits as an indirect indicator of genetic correlations in domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.). The assessment of phenotypic parameters of the exterior and live weight of reindeer was carried out at the Yamal Experimental Station, a separate structural subdivision of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution, the Tyumen Scientific Center, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The object of the study was a population sample of 94 adult females of the Nenets breed, selected at random, without constitution defects and having a calf. in October 2020. A total of 94 does (adult females) aged 3 to 9 years were examined. The animals were well-fed, had a calf and had no visible constitution defects. The sample showed high positive phenotypic correlations between “height at withers” and “height at elbow” (=0.84), “height at withers” and “chest depth” (=0.71), “live weight” and “chest girth” (=0.63), as well as between “live weight” and “chest depth” (=0.6). Genetic correlations between traits calculated using genotypes of microsatellite markers showed comparable results. For the pair of measurements “height at withers” and “height at elbow”, the genetic correlation was about 0.83, and for the pair “height at withers” and “chest depth” it was about 0.71. The results of comparative analysis between phenotypic and genetic correlation matrices demonstrated a high degree of consistency. It has been shown that phenotypic correlations can potentially be used as an indirect indicator of genetic correlations for reindeer selection for live weight and linear body dimensions.

1. Skuridin G. M., Koval S. F. Identification of genotype by phenotype using correlations of traits. // Information Bulletin of VOGIS, 2002. 6 (19): p. 3-3.

2. Sodini S. M. et al. Comparison of genotypic and phenotypic correlations: Cheverud’s conjecture in humans. // Genetics, 2018. 209 (3): p. 941-948.

3. Cheverud J. M. A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations // Evolution, 1988. 42 (5): p. 958-968.

4. Waitt D. E., Levin D. A. Genetic and phenotypic correlations in plants: a botanical test of Cheverud's conjecture //Heredity, 1998. 80(3): p. 310-319.

5. Ackermann R.R., Cheverud J.M. Discerning evolutionary processes in patterns of tamarin (genus Saguinus) craniofacial variation //American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 2002. 117(3): p. 260-271.

6. Reusch T. Blanckenhorn W. Quantitative genetics of the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea: Cheverud's conjecture revisited. //Heredity, 1998. 81(1): p. 111-119.

7. Derjazhentsev V.T., Shifner K.G. Heredity and correlation links of some economically useful traits of reindeer. // Nauch. tr., Magadan. zone. Research Institute of Agriculture of the North-East. 1978(7): p. 4-11.

8. Rozhkov Yu.I., Pronyaev A.V. Similarity coefficients between populations by quantitative traits and genotypes. // Agricultural biology. 1992(6): p. 26-35.

9. Yuzhakov A.A., Romanenko T.M., Laishev K.A. Phenogeographic variability of reindeer of the Nenets breed // Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State Agrarian University. 2017(2 (47)): p. 115-122.

10. Yuzhakov, A.A. On the heritability and repeatability of live weight in reindeer // Siberian Bulletin of Agricultural Science 2003(3): p. 165-167.

11. Yuzhakov A.A., Laishev K.A., Zbrodin V.A. Influence of hereditary and paratypic factors on meat productivity of domestic reindeer // Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2020(11 (202)): p. 93-100.

12. Røed K.H. et al. Genetic analyses reveal independent domestication origins of Eurasian reindeer // Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2008. 275 (1645): p. 1849-1855.

13. McLoughlin P.D. et al. Genetic diversity and relatedness of boreal caribou populations in western Canada //Biological Conservation. 2004. 118(5): p. 593-598.

14. Colson K.E., Mager K.H., Hundertmark K.J. Reindeer introgression and the population genetics of caribou in southwestern Alaska // Journal of Heredity. 2014. 105(5): p. 585-596.

15. Zhai J.-C. et al. Analysis on genetic diversity of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) in the Greater Khingan Mountains using microsatellite markers //Zoological studies. 2017. 56.

16. Kashtanov S.N., Zakharov E.S., Semina M.T. et al. Genetic Structure of Domesticated Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) Populations in the Central Siberian Plateau and Adjacent Areas //Russian Journal of Genetics. 2024. 60(1): p. 121-125.

17. Semina M.T., Svishcheva G.R., Sipko T.P. et al. Population structure of domestic and wild populations of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) // Proceedings of the scientific conference with international participation dedicated to the 50th anniversary of the Yu. P. Altukhov Laboratory of Population Genetics, Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. P. 53.

18. Dyachenko N.A. Recommendations for breeding work in northern reindeer herding. 1970.

19. Stolpovsky Yu.A., Babayan O.V., Kashtanov S.N. et al. Genetic assessment of reindeer breeds (Rangifer tarandus) and their wild ancestor using a new panel of STR markers // Genetics. 2020. Vol. 56. No. 12. Pp. 1410–1426.

20. Jombart, T. Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers // Bioinformatics. 2008. 24(11): p. 1403–1405.

21. Paradis, E. Pegas: an R package for population genetics with an integrated–modular approach // Bioinformatics 2010. 26(3): p. 419–420.

22. Kamvar Z.N., Tabima J.F., Grünwald N.J. Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction //PeerJ, 2014. 2: p. e281.

23. Adamack A.T., Gruber B. PopGenReport: simplifying basic population genetic analyzes in R //Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2014. 5(4): p. 384-387.

24. Suzuki R., Shimodaira H. Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering // Bioinformatics. 2006. 22(12): p. 1540-1542.

25. Goudet J. Hierfstat, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F‐statistics. // Molecular Ecology Notes. 2005. 5(1): p. 184-186.

26. Agapow P.M., Burt A. Indices of multilocus linkage disequilibrium //Molecular Ecology Notes. 2001. 1(1‐2): p. 101-102.

27. Brown A., Feldman M., Nevo E. Multilocus structure of natural populations of Hordeum spontaneum //Genetics. 1980. 96 (2): p. 523-536.

28. Kraft P., Chen H., Lindström S. The Use of Genetic Correlation and Mendelian Randomization Studies to Increase Our Understanding of Relationships between Complex Traits // Current Epidemiology Reports. 2020. 7: p. 104-112.