Features of treatment of chickens infected with Staphylococcus aureus with different sensitivity to antimicrobial drugs

Pathology caused by S. aureus in poultry remain a matter of much concern for poultry industry. In the present article we study certain aspects of infection, experimentally induced in chickens with Staphylococcus aureus, namely methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and of its treatment. Chickens of Hisex Brown cross were challenged by intraperitoneal injection of Staphylococcus aureus in suspension at a dose 3.0 x 10^8 CFUs / 0.5 mL (2 McFarland/0.5 mL). The reliable data that we obtained show that the clinical signs of staphylococcosis develop in chickens 24 hours sooner on the average when the chickens have been challenged with MRSA than after the challenge with MSSA. In the former case the clinical signs are more severe and result in the death of model animals much more often. We studied the effectiveness of some antimicrobials such as lincomycin, enrofloxacin and levofloxacin, administered via drinking water at a concentration 300 mg/L, for treatment of chickens, challenged with S. aureus with different susceptibility to the aforementioned drugs. We proved that lincomycin, enrofloxacin and levofloxacin, administered via drinking water at a concentration 300 mg/L, for treatment of chickens, challenged with MRSA, have low effectiveness. Accordingly, the mortality rate for the chickens, treated with enrofloxacin was as high as 84%, lincomycin – 76% and levofloxacin – 56%. And on the contrary, the treatment of experimental staphylococcosis, caused by the isolate, susceptible to the above-mentioned drugs, led to much better results. Remarkably high effectiveness was achieved when we administered enrofloxacin (92%). The effectiveness was a little lower in the cases of lincomycin and levofloxacin (76%).

1. Ablov A.M., Taksonomicheskaia kharakteristika vozbuditelei bakteriozov zhivotnykh i ptits na territorii Irkutskoi oblasti [Taxonomical characteristic of agents of bacterial infectious diseases of animals and birds in Irkutsk region] / [A.M. Ablov et all.] // Agrarnyi vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza [Agrarian Bulletin of the North Caucasus]. – 2016, no. 4 (24), pp. 49-53 (In Russ.).

2. Gordina E.M., Sravnitel’naia kharakteristika biologicheskikh svoistv S. aureus, vydelennykh ot cheloveka i ptits [Comparative Characteristics of Biological Properties of S. aureus Isolated from Humans and Birds] / E.M. Gordina, E.S. Gorovitz // Ekologiya cheloveka [Human Ecology]. – 2015, no. 5, pp. 52-56 (In Russ.).

3. Vidovoe raznoobrazie predstaviteley roda Staphylococcus, vydelennykh ot domashnikh i sel'skokhozyaytsvennykh zhivotnykh s razlichnymi gnoyno-vospalitel'nymi zabolevaniyami [Species diversity of members of the genus Staphylococcus isolated from domestic and farm animals with different purulent and inflammatory diseases] / A.A. Balbutskaya, O.A. Dmitrenko, A.V. Voitenko, V.N. Skvortsov // Mezhdunarodny vestnik veterinarii [International bulletin of Veterinary Medicine]. – 2015, no. 3, pp. 56- 62 (In Russ.).

4. Balbutskaya A.A. Biologicheskiie svoistva Staphylococcus aureus, vydelennogo ot bol’noi artritom ptitsy [Biological properties of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from poultry with athritis] / A.A. Balbutskaya, V.N. Skvortsov // Veterinarnyi vrach [The Veterinarian]. – 2019, no. 1, pp. 28-33 (In Russ.).

5. Pal, M. 2007. Zoonoses. 2nd Edition. Satyam Publishers, Jaipur, India.

6. Pal M. et al. Epidemiology, pathogenicity, animal infections, antibiotic resistance, public health significance, and economic impact of Staphylococcus aureus: a comprehensive review //American Journal of Public Health Research. – 2020. – Т. 8. – №. 1. – pp. 14- 21. DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-8-1-3.

7. Ono HK, Sato'o Y, Narita K, Naito I, Hirose S, Hisatsune J, Asano K, Hu DL, Omoe K, Sugai M, Nakane A. Identification and Characterization of a Novel Staphylococcal Emetic Toxin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Oct; 81(20):7034-40. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01873-15. Epub 2015 Jul 31. PMID: 26231643; PMCID: PMC4579459.

8. Hyeon JY, Chung GT, Bing SH, Kwon KS, Lee HH, Kim SJ, Jeon SE, Kang YH, Kim J. A foodborne outbreak of Staphylococcus aureus associated with fried chicken in Republic of Korea. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013 Jan; 23(1):85-7. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1210.10022. PMID: 23314372.

9. Chambers, H.F. and Deleo, F.R. (2009). Waves of Resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the Antibiotic Era. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 7: 629-641

10. Devriese, L.A., Van Damme, L.R., & Fameree, L. (1972). Methicillin (cloxacillin) ‐ resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis cases. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin. Reihe B, 19, 598–605. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1972.tb00439.x

11. Chen C, Wu F. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) colonisation and infection among livestock workers and veterinarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2020 Oct 23: oemed-2020 -106418. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106418. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33097674.

12. Liu B, Sun H, Pan Y, Zhai Y, Cai T, Yuan X, Gao Y, He D, Liu J, Yuan L, Hu G. Prevalence, resistance pattern, and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from healthy animals and sick populations in Henan Province, China. Gut Pathog. 2018 Jul 17; 10:31. doi: 10.1186/s13099-018-0254-9. PMID: 30026814; PMCID: PMC6048774.

13. Vandendriessche S, Vanderhaeghen W, Larsen J, de Mendonça R, Hallin M, Butaye P, Hermans K, Haesebrouck F, Denis O. High genetic diversity of methicillinsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) from humans and animals on livestock farms and presence of SCCmec remnant DNA in MSSA CC398. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Feb;69(2):355-62. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt366. Epub 2013 Sep 26. PMID: 24072172.

14. Methods of experimental chemotherapy: Practical guide / Edited by G.N. Pershin. – 2nd ed. – Moscow: Medicine, 1971. – 539 p.: ill.: 26 cm (In Russ.)