Preview

International Journal of Veterinary Medicine

Advanced search

The overall economic efficiency of using synbiotic for the prevention of gastrointestinal diseases in calves in the production environment

https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-2419.2021.3.66

Abstract

Today, we can consider the need to use remedies based on probiotic microorganisms in the technology of growing young farm animals as proven. Prescribed for prevention purposes, they must be not only safe and effective, but also cost-effective for the consumer. The studies presented by us were carried out in order to calculate the overall economic efficiency of the use of the developed synbiotic agent for the prevention of gastrointestinal diseases in calves in a production environment. We carried out our work in accordance with the official methodology for determining the economic efficiency of veterinary measures, approved on February 21, 1997 by the head of the Veterinary Department of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation V.M. Avilov. At the assay, 86 newborn calves were involved (SPK husbandary farm "Vtoraya Pyatiletka") - 63 calves from LLC "HLEBOROB" - 23 individuals). 31 were in the experimental group and 32 in the control group in the SPK breeding plant "Vtoraya Pyatiletka". And at the "HLEBOROB" farm 12 in the experimental group and 11 in the control group. From the third to the tenth day of life, the calves of the experimental groups were orally administered a daily dose of the synbiotic mixture two hours before morning feeding with an interval of 24 hours, in the amount of 2 doses per 10 kg of live body weight (1 dose ~ 109 CFU), dissolved at the rate of 1 dose / 0.5 ml of milk serum. According to the results of the experiments, the maximum profit in the experimental group was recorded - 30,925 rubles, which was 3 times higher than the value of the control, where this indicator was equal to 9,900 rubles, respectively.

About the Authors

V. S. Samoilenko
FSBEI HE "Stavropol State Agrarian University"
Russian Federation

postgraduate of the department of epizootology and microbiology



N. A. Ozheredova
FSBEI HE "Stavropol State Agrarian University"
Russian Federation

associate professor, doctor of veterinary sciences, head of the department of epizootology and microbiology



A. N. Simonov
FSBEI HE "Stavropol State Agrarian University"
Russian Federation

associate professor, candidate of veterinary sciences



E. V. Svetlakova
FSBEI HE "Stavropol State Agrarian University"
Russian Federation

associate professor, candidate of biological sciences



References

1. Евглевский, Д. А. Научнобиотехнологическое обоснования повышения эффективности и снижения токсичности антибиотиков / Д. А. Евглевский, А. А. Евглевский // Вестник Курской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии. – 2011. – № 2. –С. 69-71.

2. Максимович, В. В. Эпизоотическая ситуация по инфекционным болезням молодняка крупного рогатого скота в республике Беларусь / В.В. Максимович, С. Л. Гайсенок, Ю. А. Шашкова // Ученые записки учреждения образования «Витебская ордена "Знак почета" государственная академия ветеринарной медицины». – 2013. –Т. 49. –№ 1-1. –С. 37-41.

3. Абрамкова Н. В., Червонова И. В. Эффективность применения пробиотического препарата «Субтилис» для поросятотъёмышей // Вестник аграрной науки. – 2017. – № 6 (69). – С. 12-16.

4. Duse, A. Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves / A. Duse, K.P. Waller, U. Emanuelson, H.E. Unnerstad, Y. Persson, B. Bengtsson // J Dairy Sci. – 2015. – Vol. 98. – №1. – P. 500-516.

5. Scaria, J. Сomparison of phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial profiles in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica from the same dairy cattle farms / Scaria J., Warnic L. D. // Kaneene J. B., May K., Teng C. H., Chang Y. F. // Molecular And Cellular Probes. – 2010. – Dec; Vol. 24 (6). – P. 325-45.

6. Питание и метаболизм патогенных микроорганизмов / Л. Я. Теляшевская, Н. К. Букова, А. А. Комаров, В. Т. Ночевный. – М.: Издательский дом «Научная библиотека». – 2016. – 156 с.

7. Didari, T. A systematic review of the safety of probiotics / T. Didari, S. Solki, S. Mozaffari, S. Nikfar, M. Abdollahi // Expert Opin Drug Saf. – 2014. – Vol. 13. – № 2. – P. 227-239.

8. Kaur, I. P. Probiotics: potential pharmaceutical applications / I. P. Kaur, K. Chopra, A. Saini // Eur J Pharm Sci. – 2002. – Vol. 15. – № 1. – P. 1-9.

9. Aflatoxin, fumonisin and shiga toxinproducing Escherichia coli infections in calves and the effectiveness of Celmanax® / Dairyman’s Choice™ applications to eliminate morbidity and mortality losses / D. Baines, M. Sumarah, G. Kuldau, J. Juba, A. Mazza, L. Masson // Toxins. – 2013. – Vol. 5. – P. 1872-1895.

10. Соколенко, Г. Г. Пробиотики в рациональном кормлении животных / Г. Г. Соколенко, Б. П. Лазарев, С. В. Миньченко // Технологии пищевой и перерабатывающей промышленности АПК – продукты здорового питания. – 2015. – № 1 (5). – С. 72-78.

11. The influence of a complex of probiotic cultures oniIntensity of development the animals N. A. Ozheredova, E. V. Svetlakova, M. N. Verevkina, A. N. Simonov, N. V. Vasiliev // Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. March. – April. – 2016. – №7 (2). – P. 1638-1642.


Review

For citations:


Samoilenko V.S., Ozheredova N.A., Simonov A.N., Svetlakova E.V. The overall economic efficiency of using synbiotic for the prevention of gastrointestinal diseases in calves in the production environment. International Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2021;(3):66-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-2419.2021.3.66

Views: 217


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-2419 (Print)