Preview

International Journal of Veterinary Medicine

Advanced search

The effect of various cryoprotective components on the survival of probiotic microorganisms after freeze drying

https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2072-2419.2022.1.69

Abstract

In this study, the influence of various cryoprotectants on the viability of the consortium of probiotic microorganisms Lactobacillus plantarum 8β and Bifidobacterium adolescentis 17-11β after the lyophilic drying. These strains are manufacturing strains and are used for preparing feed additives. A total of 6 different protective environments were tested. The basis of all tested cryoprotector media was skimmed milk in a quantity of 10%, as cryoprotectants also used sucrose, lactose and SiO2, which were added to the skimmed milk in various combinations. Lyophilic drying was carried out according to standard procedure, with preliminary freezing of samples in cryostat up to minus 72ºC, the lyophilization process lasted 26 hours, during which the vacuum index varied from 40 Pa to 4 Pa, The temperature was raised to 28ºC. The effect of the protective medium on the survival of probiotic microorganisms was determined by planting a series of crops on agar MRS-4, incubation at 37ºC in 48 hours, and then counting the colonies. Crops were produced before the drying procedure (the number of colonies was 100%) and immediately after. The highest survival rates of probiotic bacteria were obtained using a protective medium based on 10% skimmed milk and 10% skimmed milk with 2% SiO2 added, accounting for 81.84% and 82.48% respectively. The moisture content of the samples after drying was as follows: Medium based on 10% skimmed milk - 4.40%; 10% of skimmed milk plus 2% SiO2 - 4.93%. This humidity for lyophilic preparations of these bacteria is optimal, and promotes long-term storage of samples with continued viability.

About the Author

N. V. Yavnikov
Non-infectious Pathology Chair
Russian Federation

 Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Associate Professor 



References

1. Грачева И.В., Осин А.В. Механизмы повреждений бактерий при лиофилизации и протективное действие защитных сред / И.В. Грачева, А.В. Осин // Проблемы особо опасных инфекций. – 2016. – № 3. С. 5-12

2. Явников Н.В. Изучение антагонистической активности штаммов лактобактерий и бифидобактерий против возбудителей маститов у коров / Н.В. Явников, А.В. Ткачев // Вестник Бурятской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии им. В.Р. Филиппова. – 2021. - № 1 (62). – С. 76-82.

3. Коваленко А.М. Антимикробная и обезболивающая активность нового экспериментального препарата на основе наносеребра для лечения маститов крупного рогатого скота / А.М. Коваленко, А.В. Ткачёв, О.Л. Ткачёва, Т.В. Зубова, В.А. Плешков, О.В. Смоловская // Вестник Алтайского государственного аграрного университета. – 2019. – № 11 (181). – С. 84-98.

4. Костюк А.Д. Молекулярно-генетическая оценка устойчивости коров к маститам / А.Д. Костюк, А.В. Ткачёв // В книге: Горинские чтения. Инновационные решения для АПК. Материалы Международной студенческой научной конференции. В 4-х томах. - 2020. - С. 32.

5. Yong HL, Marc BB, Tahir N, Quader A, Gary PM. Effects of Sucrose and Trehalose on the Preservation of the Native Structure of Spray-Dried Lysozyme. Pharmaceutical Research. 2004; 9(12):1847–53.

6. Leslie SB, Israeli E, Lighthart B, Crowe JH, Crowe LM. Trehalose and sucrose protect both membranes and proteins in intact bacteria during drying. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1995; 61:3592–7.

7. Champagne CF, Gardner N, Brochu E, Beaulieu Y. The freeze-drying of lactic acid bacteria. A review Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal. 1991; 24:118–28.

8. Thammavongs B, Corroler D, Panoff JM, Auffray Y, Boutibonnes P. Physiological response of Enterococcus faecalis JH2-2 to cold shock: growth at low temperatures and freezing/ thawing challenge. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 1996; 23:398–402.


Review

For citations:


Yavnikov N.V. The effect of various cryoprotective components on the survival of probiotic microorganisms after freeze drying. International Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2022;(1):69-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2072-2419.2022.1.69

Views: 304


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-2419 (Print)