Indicators of the general resistance of breeding bulls depending on age, origin and breed

Humoral factors such as bactericidal and lysozyme activity are the most significant for the body's resistance. The purpose of the research was to study the nonspecific resistance of sires depending on age, place of adaptation before entering the Russian Federation, origin and breed. The work was carried out at JSC “Head Reproduction Center” (JSC “GCV”) on animals aged from 2 to 9 years in the amount of 34 heads. Such indicators as the percentage of lysis, the amount of lysozyme (mcg) in 1 ml of blood serum, specific units of activity (u.a.) calculated per 1 mg of protein and the bactericidal activity of blood serum as a percentage were studied. Lysozyme (LASK) and bactericidal activity (BASK) were studied using a Multiskan FC microbiological analyzer (Finland). Thus, it has been established that the general resistance of sires depends on age and has significant differences between animals of different age groups. At the age of 2-3 years there is no reliability. Significant differences between bulls according to the parameters we studied begin from 5 years of age at P <0.05 in the concentration of total protein and lysozyme and specific units. A. squirrel. Age range had no effect on BAS. More noticeable significant differences were recorded in animals (of contrasting age periods) in terms of general resistance and had significant differences at the level of P≤0.01 in the percentage of lysis, in the amount of lysozyme in the blood serum (P≤0.001), and specific units of activity (P≤0.001). It was found that sires coming from different regions of Europe (the Netherlands and Germany + Luxembourg) in the same age range do not have significant differences among themselves in the overall resistance of the parameters we studied (BASK and LASK) under the conditions of their operation in the Moscow region RF.

1. Bazanova N. U. Fiziologiya sel'skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh / N. U. Bazanova, A. N. Golikov, Z. K. Kozhebekov, M. F. Meshcheryakova, G. V. Parshutin, A. N. Safonov. Pod red. A. N. Golikova, G. V. Parshutina. M.: Kolos, 1980. 480 p. [in Russ.]

2. Bogolyubova N. V. Metabolicheskii status organizma bykov-proizvoditelei raznykh genotipov / N. V. Bogolyubova, R. A. Rykov // Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo. 2020. № 3. P. 46-50. DOI 10.33943/MMS.2020.45.31.008. [in Russ.]

3. Osidze D. F. Faktory rezistentnosti organizma zhivotnykh / D. F. Osidze, A. P. Prostyakov // Veterinariya. 1983. №3. P. 33-34. [in Russ.]

4. Plyashchenko S. I. Povyshenie estestvennoi rezistentnosti organizma zhivotnykh – osnova profilaktiki boleznei / S. I. Plyashchenko // Veterinariya. 1991. №6. P. 49-52. [in Russ.]

5. Fedorov Yu. N. Immunodefitsity: diagnostika i puti predotvrashcheniya / Yu. N. Fedorov // Veterinariya sel'skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh. 2009. №3. P. 4-8. [in Russ.]

6. Bol'shakova A. Pokazateli krovi i produktivnost' / A. Bol'shakova // Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii. 2015. №2. P. 35-37. [in Russ.]

7. Velikanov V. I. Kolostral'nyi immunitet i stanovlenie nespetsificheskoi rezistentnosti u telyat pod vliyaniem immunomodulyatorov / V. I. Velikanov, A. V. Klyapnev, L. V. Kharitonov, S. S. Terent'ev. SanktPeterburg: Lan', 2021. 160 p. [in Russ.]

8. Pokulevich V. A. Vliyanie preparate «Enroflokkavetferok-B» na bakteritsidnuyu i lizotsimnuyu aktivnost' syvorotki krovi i fagotsitarnuyu aktivnost' neitrofilov / V. A. Pokulevich, A. V. Zaitseva, G. E. Dremach, V. V. Zaitseva // Uchenye zapiski UO VGAVM. 2018. V.54(3). P. 30-36. [in Russ.]

9. Venkataramanis S. Thermal stability of high concentration lysozyme across varying pH: A Fourier Transform Infrared study / S. Venkataramanis, J. Truntzer, D. Coleman // J. Pharm. Bioallied. Sci. 2013. V.5. №2. P. 148-153. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.111821.

10. Sarukhanov V. Ya. Metod opredeleniya lizotsimnoi aktivnosti krovi sel'skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh / V. Ya. Sarukhanov, N. N. Isamov, I. M. Kolganov // Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya. 2012. №2. P. 119-122. [in Russ.]

11. Goncharova A. I. Antimikrobnaya aktivnost' lizotsima kak faktor nespetsificheskoi rezistentnosti / A. I. Goncharova, V. K. Okulich, V. Yu. Zemko, S. A. Sel'kovich // Vestnik VGMU. 2019. V.18. №4. P. 40-45. doi: https//doi.org/10.10.22263/2312-41-56.2019.4.40. [in Russ.]

12. Gugushvili N.N. Dependence of the nonspecific resistance in cows from their physiological and clinical state / N. N. Gugushvili // Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2003. V. 136. № 6. P. 548-550.

13. Baimishev M. Kh. Pokazateli estestvennoi rezistentnosti organizma vysokoproduktivnykh korov / M. Kh. Baimishev, S. P. Eremin, S. A. Baimisheva // Innovatsionnye dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK: sbornik nauchnykh trudov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno -prakticheskoi konferentsii. Kinel', 2018. P. 8–10. [in Russ.]

14. Chamyi S. A. Gematologicheskie pokazateli i estestvennaya rezistentnost' ovets posle korrektsii preparatom «Sedimin» v usloviyakh tekhnogennogo zagryazneniya / S. A. Chamyi // Prirodnye resursy, sreda i obshchestvo. 2021. №1(9). P. 68-74. DOI: 10.24412/2658-4441-2021-1-68-74. [in Russ.]

15. Marenkov V. G. Vliyanie genotipa bykov-proizvoditelei na parametry nespetsificheskoi rezistentnosti potomstva / V.G. Marenkov // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015. №3. P. 603. [in Russ.]

16. Zalyubovskaya E. Yu. Vliyanie skarmlivaniya razlichnykh form mikroelementov na rost, razvitie i obmen veshchestv molodnyaka krupnogo rogatogo skota / E.Yu. Zalyubovskaya, A. N. Chubysh // Dal'nevostochnyi agrarnyi vestnik. 2017. № 4 (44). P. 116-120. [in Russ.]

17. Shkuratova I. A. Rol' ekologicheskikh faktorov v razvitii gumoral'nogo immunodefitsita u zhivotnykh / I. A. Shkuratova, N. A. Vereshchak, S. V. Malkov // BIO. 2018. №11. P.31-34. [in Russ.]

18. Pereselkova D. A. Rezistentnost' molochnykh korov v tranzitnyi period laktatsii i puti ee povyshenie / D. A. Pereselkova, O. A. Artem'eva, Yu. P. Fomichev, O. V. Pavlyuchenkova // Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo. 2015. №3. P. 8-10. [in Russ.]