Preview

International Journal of Veterinary Medicine

Advanced search

Influence of the phytobiothic complex on laboratory animals

Abstract

Studies of acute and subacute toxicity of the new phytobiotic sorption complex were carried out on the basis of the St. Petersburg Academy of Veterinary Medicine. The study of the studied parameters was studied according to the "Guidelines for conducting preclinical studies of medicines", ed. A.N. Mironov (2012). The hazard class of the investigational drugs was determined according to GOST 12.1.007-76. To study the parameters of acute toxicity, four groups of rats with 30 heads each were formed. Two experimental groups were injected phyto-biotic complex inside, in a double and fourfold dose, from the experimentally therapeutic 5,800 and 12,000 mg / kg, rats in the control groups were administered a similar amount of isotonic sodium chloride solution. To study the subacute toxicity of the phyto-biotic complex, two groups of white Wistar rats weighing 160 ± 10.0 g were formed, 30 heads each. A phyto-biotic complex at a dose of 6000 mg/ kg was added to the experimental group of laboratory animals for a standard diet for 28 days. The control group received a standard diet, without any additives. The animals were weighed and, at the end of our experiment, conducted a comprehensive survey of the experimental animals. Blood samples were taken to determine hematological and biochemical parameters. An acute experiment on the effect of the phyto-biotic complex on laboratory animals showed that oral administration, in a double and a fourfold dose, from experimentally therapeutic, does not have a toxic effect. The case of experimental animals was not fixed. By the degree of toxicity, the investigated phyto-biotic complex can be classified as the IV hazard class (low-hazard substances).

About the Authors

O. S. Popova
ФГБОУ ВО «Санкт-Петербургская государственная академия ветеринарной медицины»
Russian Federation


V. A. Barishev
ФГБОУ ВО «Санкт-Петербургская государственная академия ветеринарной медицины»
Russian Federation


References

1. Барышев В.А, Глушкова О.С., Лунегов А.М. Аспекты решения проблемы антибиоти-котерапии в ветеринарной практике // Международный вестник ветеринарии. - 2016 № 1 С. 23-27.

2. Волков Г.К. Проблема выращивания здорового молодняка / Г. К. Волков [и др.] // Ветеринария. - 1997. - № 2. - С. 7-12.

3. Ишимов В.А Влияние пробиотических препаратов на продуктивность цыплят-бройлеров / В.А. Ишимов, ЛЮ. Овчинникова // Кормление сельскохозяйственных животных и кормопроизводство - 2013. - № 1. - С. 58-64.

4. Кузнецов А.Ф., Мухина Н.В., Коротков В.И., Сарсембаева Н.В., Аккузин Г.Д., Шариф А.М. Применение алкмосиликатов для коррекции продуктивности у сельскохозяйственных животных // Тез.

5. Рабинович М.И., Лекарственные растения в ветеринарной практике: Справочник. - М.:Агропромиздат, 1987. - 288с.

6. Раделов С. Ю. «Всё о лекарственных растениях», Издательство «СЗКЭО», 2016 г. - 192.

7. Толмачева А.А. Лекарственные растения и их компоненты как ингибиторы системы quor-umsensing первого типа у бактерий: Дис.. канд. биол. наук. - Оренбург, 2015. - 129 с.

8. Труфанов О. Фитобиотики в рационах бройлеров // Животноводство России. - 2016. -№ 10. - С. 5-7.

9. Ткаченко К.Г., Платонов В.Г., Сацыперова И.Ф. Антивирусная и антимикробная активность эфирных масел из плодов рода HeracleumL. (Apiaceae) // Раст. Ресурсы. 1995. - Т.31. вып. 1. - С. 9-19

10. Hristov A.N., McAllister T.A, Van Herk F.H., Cheng K.J., Newbold C.J., Cheeke P.R. Effect of Yucca schidigera on ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestion in heifers. Journal of Animal Science, 1999. Vol. 77. N. 9. P. 2554 - 2563.

11. Vondruskova H., Slamova R., Trckova M., Zraly Z.,Pavlik I. Alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters inprevention of diarrhoea in weaned piglets: a review. Veterinarni Medicina. 2010; 55 (5): 199-224.

12. Wang Y., McAllister T.A, Yanke L.J., Cheeke P.R. Effect of steroidal saponin from Yucca schidigera extract on ruminal extract on ruminal microbes. Journal of Applied Microbiology. Oxford, 2000. Vol. 88. N. 5. P. 887 - 896.

13. Ziemer C.J. Glibson G.R. An overview of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in the functional food concept: perspectives and future strategies. International Dairy Journal, 1988. Vol. 8. N. 5 6. P. 473 -479.

14. European Commission. 2003. Regulation (EC) №. 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition // Official Journal of European Union. 2003. Vol. 268. P. 29-43.

15. Windisch W., Schedle K., Plitzner C., Kroismayr A. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry // Journal of Animal Science. 2008. Vol. 86. P. E140-E148.


Review

For citations:


Popova O.S., Barishev V.A. Influence of the phytobiothic complex on laboratory animals. International Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2018;(2):60-64. (In Russ.)

Views: 196


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-2419 (Print)